Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine ›› 2008, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4): 337-339.doi: 10.3736/jcim20080402
• Editorial • Previous Articles Next Articles
How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis
Jun-hua Zhang1,2, Hong-cai Shang1,2, Bo-li Zhang2(
)
- 1. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China
2. Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China
CLC Number:
- R-3
| [1] | Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS , et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM(2nd ed)[M]. London: Churchill-Livingstone, 2000,( 2nd ed):1-50 |
| [2] |
Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A , et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals[J]. JAMA, 1998,280(3):278-280
doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.278 |
| [3] | . Sunny Downstate Medical Center.Guide to research methods—the evidence pyramid( |
| [4] |
Oxman AD . Checklists for review articles[J]. BMJ, 1994,309(6955):648-651
doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6955.648 |
| [5] |
Senn S . The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased[J]. BMJ, 2000,321(7256):297
doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.297 |
| [6] |
Sacks H, Berrier J, Reitman D , et al. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials[J]. N Engl J Med, 1987,316(8):450-455
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55895-0_6 pmid: 3807986 |
| [7] | Sacks HS, Reitman D, Pagano D , et al. Meta-analysis: an update[J]. Mt Sinai J Med, 1996,63(3-4):216-224 |
| [8] |
Sun FH, Wei SY, Xu ZM , et al. Quality evaluation of meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials[J]. Yao Wu Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, 2002,11(1):31-36
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0698.2002.01.012 |
|
孙福红, 魏水易, 许自明 , 等. 随机对照试验Meta分析的质量评价[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2002,11(1):31-36
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0698.2002.01.012 |
|
| [9] |
Jadad AR, Moher M, Browman GP , et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation[J]. BMJ, 2000,320(7234):537-540
doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.537 |
| [10] |
Altman DG, Decks JJ, Clarke M , et al. The quality of systematic reviews. High quality reporting of both randomised trials and systematic reviews should be priority[J]. BMJ, 2000,321(7256):297
doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.297 |
| [11] |
Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G , et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1995,16(1):62-73
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-W |
| [12] |
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S , et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses[J]. Lancet, 1999,354(9193):1896-1900
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5 |
|